Bruno Pinheiro

July 7, 2008 6:43 pm

categories:
Brasil, Politics, Rio de Janeiro

And this is how the police force works in Rio de Janeiro.

So, who’s gonna protect us citizens from our police force?

June 25, 2008 3:08 pm

categories:
Technology, cyberculture

I installed, after the big World Failure Download Day, the version 3.0 of Firefox. Although it has lots of technical improvements, some things seemed to me a worst version than the predecessor. Take the location bar (autocomplete history function) for example.

The overcrowded Location bar in Firefox 3.0

I first got very shocked when saw the new version. It seemed to me too much unnecessary cluttered information. The previous version shows only a list of the URLs. The new version brings me Favicons, URLs, Site name…but the new layout does not make it easy to read and rapidly identify the URL in the middle of this so overcrowded information. Things got so messy that they decided to put some lines between the items in order to “help reading”. Ouch!

The elegant and simple location bar in the previous Firefox 2.0

It seems that this isn’t my only and lonely impression. As you can see, there’s an add-on to revert exclusively the location toolbar to the older version.

The second “improvement” that seemed to be a bad move was the Downloaded Items list. The poor design of the new version with big fonts, heavy contrasted colors between selected and unselected items, less space between the items, cluttered and unnecessary information, and a mysterious search field (search where?) again show that some bad decisions were made.

The horsy downloaded items dialog box in Firefox 3.0

The more elegant downloaded items dialog box in Firefox 2.0. Somebody, please give me a link to an add-on to use this older version!

I surely prefer in general the Firefox 3.0 with all its technical and performance improvements, but in therms of usability and interaction design, the community really have to go back to work a little more.

June 9, 2008 11:05 am

categories:
Design & Marketing, Technology, cyberculture

We’ve seen this before. A new technology is brought to the masses, we don’t really know it’s secret dangers, we just love it and use it massively. Latter than the same scientists that discovered it finds that it gives us the cancer or worse. But industry and people became too much dependent that we can’t afford living without it. Does anybody really imagine living today without a carbon monoxide producer named car? How long did it take until we got a non-pollutant alternative and how long will it take until it becomes a industry standard?

Now we’re going to the same way with mobile phones, waiting until somebody’s brain burns out.

Don’t have any way to make some pop-corn? Try calling to your own mobile phone!

update: so, what’s the real story? Did I go through an April’s fool joke?

updated: 06/16/2008 - The mystery revealed: it was just a viral campaign from a headset company. And a very good one. They caught me, but I really liked it!

May 19, 2008 12:13 am

categories:
Information Architecture, Technology

As I wrote before, I’m at the Semantic Technology Conference or SemTech2008 to simplify. The first day was only to align concepts and put everyone up to date of where we are.

Dave McComb, from Semantic Arts opened with a presentation basically highlighting the basic concepts that would be discussed along the event. Some are pretty old, like False positives and False negatives on search results, but the approach was obviously how semantic apps could help improving these questions. The shift from the web as we know is inevitable, due to the great amount of unstructured data is generating noise and it’s getting hard to work with the relational data model. Data must shift to Information, as information means knowledge. And some of the most recent efforts are on the Entity Extraction, with lots of tools for finding and associating entities found in text with concepts on ontologies. At the end, these information would allow the systems to make inferences and discoveries that wasn’t initially declared.

Ivan Herman, specialist from W3C on semantic web, made a broad presentation of what they’re focusing at the W3C, which are the discussions that are burning at the community and talked about some technologies that they are putting their bets on. As far as I saw, Dublin Core and FOAF are a common sense at the vocabulary level, as they appeared as good examples in both presentations and in every book about semantic. SPARQL is the Query Language that with RDF and WOL OWL seems to be under the spotlight now.

Ivan talked a little about an interesting project called the ‘Linking Open Data Project’, which Goal is to ‘expose open databases in RDF’, setting RDF links among data items from different databases and setting up SPARQL endpoints to query the data. The first practical project One of the projects of this initiative is the DBPedia: by extracting data from that “infobox” on wikipedia pages (right columm) from a City, for example, and integrating with the city information on the US Census database they can build a stronger an richer knowledge of that city.

At this elaboration stage there are still lots of issues, but these were the ones Ivan talked about: security, trust, provenance; ontology merging, alignment, term equivalences; Uncertainty. The most important for me were the ontology merging and uncertainty. The web as we know was build on sharing and linking documents. Now, on the Semantic wave the same concept must be applied. There’s no need to build a complete new ontology on geonames, for example. Just link to an existing and build one just for your own knowledge domain. I firmly agree with this vision.

But was we already know, documents published on the web are hard to control, and there’s no guarantee that they’ll be there forever. A 404 result for a document search is no big deal, but when it comes to build an application based on an external ontology maintained for a third part that you have no relation, there’s a huge difference. That was an issue that I personally asked Ivan, and he said everybody is asking the same question, that’s a big problem that the W3C itself is worried about, but unfortunately there’s no light at the end of the tunnel yet.

Who’s gonna take care of the integrity of all these dependencies?

Ivan’s presentation for the SemTech2008 is available for download at the W3C website.

updated: Daniela Barbosa shared on her delicious some links from this first day.

May 15, 2008 5:45 pm

categories:
Information Architecture

Just a quick note… tomorrow I’ll fly to San Jose, California, to take part (as an atendee) of the SEMTECH - Semantic-Technology Conference 2008. I’ll see if I can post some notes about what I’ll see, but can’t guarantee that.